BY DR. BAYNE FRENCH
In Part 1, I detailed the specifics of the FASTER study, so the antithesis of high sugar fueling may be understood. With knowledge of the extremes, perhaps a healthy and enjoyably sustainable fueling method could be developed for your own endurance demands.
Biochemistry and Metabolism:
I do believe the best decisions are made in an educated state, free of bias. Becoming educated and shucking bias are truly transcendent human attributes, thus exceedingly rare.
I think it critical to have a basic understanding about what happens chemically when your blood stream is flooded with sugar. With this knowledge you may choose to stick with the status quo because it is working for you, or you may choose to go a different direction entirely.
I have written about metabolism many times. I feel that most diseases, most of what we will all die of, is a result of distorted metabolism. A sick metabolism leads to unwanted weight gain, type 2 diabetes, stroke, heart attack, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancers. Having an efficient metabolism reduces disease, medication, ass-time in doctor’s offices, and enhances health span and lifespan in a remarkable way.
My entire perspective on health and wellness, including athletic fueling, is viewed through the metabolic lens.
Metabolism involves the conversion of food particles to energy, and the storage of these particles for future energy. The overview is this:
Food + Oxygen = Carbon dioxide, water, and energy.
Food contains a lot of stuff, like fiber, vitamins, minerals, pigments and other nutrients. For metabolic purposes whether it is protein, carbohydrate, or fat, food consists of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Protein also contains nitrogen. Just 4 basic elements.
This is not an exhaustive discussion of biochemical reactions. The topic of this article is a discussion of high carbohydrate fueling for exercise and its resultant harms. Consequently, the focus will be on blood sugar.
Sugar is sucrose. It consists of one molecule of glucose and one molecule of fructose linked together. Most carbohydrate, whether sucrose or a slice of bread, is broken down in the intestine to single molecules of glucose and fructose.
Glucose is absorbed into the blood stream by its own transporter complex called SGLT1. Fructose has its own transporter called GLUT5. These are the transporters that Dr. Jeukendrup, discussed earlier, showed could be increased in number and efficiency with “gut training”.
Enzymes are proteins that help a chemical reaction move forward. There are enzymes that specifically metabolize glucose. When glucose builds up and is in excess, these enzymes are shut down. This is called feed-back inhibition.
Despite huge amount of sugar consumption, and heightened sugar absorption from the gut from “gut training”, there are still bottlenecks with how much glucose can be converted to energy, ATP.
And THIS is what we’re really trying to do…make lots of ATP because this is what makes muscles move.
Insulin:
Insulin is a hormone that is made in the pancreas. Like all hormones it travels by the blood stream and exerts effects far removed from its organ of origin. There is no more potent modulator of metabolism than insulin.
When there is an increase in blood sugar, insulin is released. All of our 40 trillion cells have a docking port on their surface for insulin. This allows sugar to go from the blood and into the cell. Insulin is potently anabolic. Meaning it builds things. It builds muscle, glycogen (storage form of carb), and is particularly good at building fat.
First of all, with heavy exertion, it does not make a lot of chemical sense to have a hormone spike that is responsible for building things, when we really need to break things down to provide fuel. However, insulin is very good and in fact vital and allowing the entry of glucose into the cell. Glucose then undergoes a chemical process called glycolysis, and a little bit of energy is made in the form of ATP. After glycolysis, glucose remnants then enter the citric acid cycle, and eventually oxidative phosphorylation. This last set of reactions results in the majority of ATP formation.
ATP is directly responsible for the movement of our muscles. And this is what endurance athlete’s really care about…repetitive, prolonged muscle movement under a load, preferably performed better than everyone else in the race. Some athletes want this so badly, metabolic consequences be damned.
As mentioned, insulin is the most potent metabolic hormone. It is so powerful that to counteract its effects requires 3 other hormones: Glucagon, epinephrine, and cortisol. We already discussed that insulin is what allows glucose (blood sugar) to enter the cell. Inside the cell is where glucose is converted to energy, ATP.
Insulin has many other effects:
- Formation of glycogen, our form of carbohydrate storage.
- Prevents the breakdown of glycogen.
- Causes the conversion of carbohydrate to fat.
- Increases percent body fat.
- Prevents the breakdown of fat.
- Helps convert protein into muscle tissue.
- Stimulates glycolysis, the first step of glucose metabolism inside the cell.
- Prevents gluconeogenesis, the formation of new glucose.
- Prevents the conversion of lactic acid into glucose.
- Results in cellular proliferation, increasing the risk of heart disease and cancer.
Metabolic Consequences of Elevated Insulin:
When blood sugar is elevated and insulin levels high, you are a One Trick Pony. You cannot use protein and fat to create new glucose in a process called gluconeogenesis.
More importantly, you are unable to access fat for fuel. Fat tissue is broken down in a process called lipolysis. Insulin directly inhibits this. After fat is broken down it is metabolized in a process called beta-oxidation. Insulin further inhibits this reaction. Consequently, the dramatic amounts of energy (ATP) that fat is capable of providing is completely unrealized in a high insulin environment.
Lactic acid is normally made in the process of glycolysis. Much more is produced with strenuous exercise. High-level athletes recognize this chemical as causing soreness and being basically a nuisance. Lactic acid can however be a source of energy. It can be taken up from the blood stream by the liver and converted into more glucose. Insulin interferes with this process.
Heart muscle preferentially burns fat for fuel. Heart cells are very adept at performing beta-oxidation, breaking down fat into smaller pieces that then enter the citric acid cycle, and eventually oxidative phosphorylation to yield a huge amount of ATP.
Insulin directly interferes with the breakdown of fat and the heart’s ability to create energy. I could be wrong but I think most endurance activity requires a well-functioning heart and high insulin levels from a blood stream flooded with sugar directly impairs the hearts’ ability to burn fat.
Mentioned in the section above is that insulin stimulates proliferation, or growth, of cells. Fu et al. (Mol Metab. 2021) reports how insulin directly and indirectly affects arteries “exacerbating the development of endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, restenosis, poor wound healing and even myocardial dysfunction”. These abnormalities are independent of blood sugar levels.
Patil et al. (Mo Med. 2012.) details the myriad cardiovascular complications that can afflict endurance athletes. These problems occur at a higher incidence, and at an earlier age in endurance athletes. Insulin is a primary driver of this.
Leitner et al. (Biochem J. 2022) in a fascinating article titled Insulin and cancer: a tangled web details the chemical reasons behind how insulin can drive cancer formation. Thirteen cancer types are found to occur with much higher incidence in individuals with obesity. A primary driver for the vast majority of individuals with obesity is chronic hyperinsulinemia (ongoing and prolonged elevated insulin blood levels).
Although Patil et al. above reported on cardiovascular diseases in endurance athletes, there is no compelling evidence to date that endurance athletes incur a higher risk of cancer. There is however, a mechanism of heightened risk associated with high insulin levels. Recommendations of 60-90 grams of carbohydrate per hour results in extreme insulin formation from the pancreas.
Muscle Types:
Maybe you have heard about white and red muscle types. It is as true in your Thanksgiving turkey as it is in us.
White muscle is lighter in color. It is considered a fast-twitch muscle type, capable of burst contraction. The turkey breast possesses this type of muscle. Sprinters and weightlifters also have a disproportionate amount of white muscle. White muscle is most efficient at burning glucose to create ATP.
Red muscle is a slower-twitch muscle fiber, capable of prolonged, sustained and repetitive contraction. Sounds a lot like endurance movement. Here is where high carb fueling recommendations becomes incongruous with efficient movement. Red muscle is most efficient at burning fat as its primary fuel to form of ATP. High carbohydrate fueling flies in the face of this. Thus the advice from Dr. Jeukendrup and Andy Blow is made further questionable.
A Bit More Biochemistry:
I detail how sugar detrimentally affects performance in an article Sugar. The Antithetic Performance Enhancer. A couple (of the hundreds) of highlights from the article:
- Nitric oxide is a potent chemical produced by the body that increases blood flow to tissues. It also allows entry of glucose into muscle tissue. It is a performance enhancer. Sugar directly interferes with the formation of nitric oxide.
- Sugar drives the formation of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). This means you urinate less, holding onto more fluid, further interfering with your power to weight ratio. Furthermore, ADH is a vasoconstrictor, meaning it constricts blood vessels to muscle. None of this is helpful for performance.
Recall that half of sugar is fructose. Fructose is a potent driver of uric acid which is associated with multiple chronic diseases. Although uric acid is most known for causing gout its metabolic effects are wide reaching. Here is an excerpt from that article I wrote Uric Acid and Its Metabolic Effects:
Whether you are afflicted with gout or not, elevated uric acid drives the formation of insulin resistance, elevated blood sugar, type 2 diabetes, elevated blood pressure, distorted cholesterol, systemic inflammation and weight gain. It is directly implicated in a large percentage of all-cause mortality and especially cardiovascular disease (Chen et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology Feb 2009).
The evidence between elevated uric acid and metabolic mayhem is strong enough that it is considered an independent risk factor. This means that on its own, elevated uric acid corresponds with disease.
An average adult human mammal has about 400 grams (14 ounces) of stored carbohydrate in the form of glycogen. This corresponds with less than 2000 calories. This amount could singularly provide enough ATP for 90-120 minutes of vigorous exercise.
A lean adult human mammal can have 10 kilograms (over 20 pounds) of fat providing upwards of 100,000 calories.
With excessive sugar fueling, blood sugar levels spike. Glycogen stores may stay replete but there is a lot of blood sugar left over. It will invariably spillover into fat formation. The stress hormone cortisol is elevated with heavy exertion. Cortisol will preferentially direct fat storage into the midsection, creating visceral fat. This type of fat is different from fat stores under our skin, called subcutaneous fat. Visceral fat releases hundreds of unfavorable chemicals that drive organ dysfunction over time.
High sugar consumption > Elevated blood sugar > Elevated insulin > Insulin resistance
Further elevated insulin > Increased cardiovascular disease and cancer risk > Fat formation and inability to burn fat
Exercise and relative reduction in calories (as in lower carbohydrate endurance fueling) triggers the formation of a protein called AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK).
Stay with me here. AMPK does so many good things. Two of which are:
- AMPK stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis. This is the formation of NEW mitochondria, and mitochondria are what make ATP that fuels your performance.
- AMPK stimulates the process of autophagy. This is the removal of damaged and old cellular components. It’s like cellular housecleaning. Poor autophagy is a driver of several diseases.
Let’s End This Thing:
I have absolutely no use for high carbohydrate fueling during exercise and no respect for it being recommended. I view it to be health harming on many levels. There are no disputing myriad metabolic effects of sugar, none of which are favorable. If you try to dispute them you are either ignorant, mired in dogma and the status quo, or on the payroll of some sugar-touting entity.
There are so many metabolic flaws to the recommendation for high carbohydrate fueling during exercise. With inane practices of sugar-gorging, it is not biochemically possible to create a huge amount of energy from fat; perform mitochondrial biogenesis, and autophagy. Furthermore high insulin results, driving visceral fat formation, cardiovascular disease and numerous cancers.
I’ve put myself through physical suffrage that I wouldn’t wish on people I dislike. And that’s a lot of people. Exertion and discomfort that sometimes went on for days in pursuit of things with points and full curls. I’m all about seeking an edge, and investigating that which could confer an advantage over other mammals of my own species or different. Stuffing myself with a known toxin and a primary perturber of a healthy and efficient metabolism is not an “edge” at all, regardless of the resume of the pontiffs recommending it.
It is a leap of faith in a way, to undergo a complete metabolic change in how you generate fuel. It takes time, perhaps upwards of a year, to be truly “fat adapted” meaning able to extract vast amounts of energy from the burning of fat. It is the rare high-level endurance athlete that will change a behavior that seems to be working well for them. Especially given that their window of optimal performance is relatively short. I am not writing for these people.
If you are not of this extreme performance persuasion, I would urge you to buck this metabolically flawed trend. Do not be a One Trick Pony, completely dependent on sugar to generate ATP. Lower amounts of carbohydrate consumption per hour results in lower amounts of insulin. Fat stores are then accessible which lead to an amazing amount of ATP for muscle contraction. Importantly is that lower insulin level over time that confers a much lower risk of disease.
Always be your own advocate. The willingness to follow deeply flawed and unhealthy guidelines has a lot to do with psychology. Observing influential people doing something with good results drives a similar behavior. Break free from this. Ask yourselves difficult questions. Understanding basic mechanisms is a platform from which you can embark on a different and much healthier exercise fueling strategy. I hope this article provides that for you.
16 comments
What a mess of a article. You’ve clearly displayed your ignorance and disconnect from up to date literature AND flawed analysis between the needs of high performance athletes and sedentary people.
No coach in their right mind is advocating for a extremely high carb intakes for regular athletes. And where do we draw the line of what level an athlete is to need higher amounts of carbs? We don’t. It’s based on fuelling the work and recovery for the demands of that day and possibly the workouts proceeding it. This entire topic needs to be addressed holistically and you’re cherry picking “high carbohydrate fuelling during exercise”, which there absolutely is a benefit for in lot’s of applications as an athlete.
———
Hammer Nutrition replied:
Hello Menace, with a screen name like that and no history in our systems, you are certainly a troll. You who is confused and self contradicting. I’ve been speaking about this holistically for over three decades, with dozens of articles on the subject during that time. Do your homework next time. Sugar ruins your health and is NOT the best choice for fueling any athlete of any age or ability . Who ever said anything about coaches? High sugar products are being hyped on every street corner. Are you trying to say that all of these products are only for elite athletes? That’s a joke. The bigger and more unfortunate joke is anyone telling “regular” athletes they should mimic pro cyclists by following “up to date literature”, but only the studies that tout high carb fueling. Elite athletes are subject to the same metabolic effects of sugar as average athletes, both short term and long term. That’s why there are so many former pro athletes with type II diabetes and other metabolic dysfunction from decades of guzzling sugar. Peak athletic performance can be achieved without ruining one’s health and longevity, and we have countless clients that confirm this fact. BDF
Preach! As a 60-year-old cyclist, this information is extremely valuable. I’ve educated myself in the last year about sugar consumption, so much so that I wear a CGM just to see the effects of diet, exercise, and stress on my glucose levels. So far, so good. I’ve reduced/eliminated sugar from my diet and try my best to adhere to a “less is more” carbs approach for endurance fueling. I now feel great on the bike. I applaud Hammer for always bringing science into the conversation. As this article says, most people might turn a blind eye to the facts and continue the sugar overload, which is problematic on so many levels, particularly concerning the increased risk of the mentioned distorted metabolism. I won’t call out other suppliers of athlete fuel/nutrition by name, but I receive daily solicitations inviting me to consider extremely high-carb fructose products for “superior performance,” which cause more harm than good. I place a higher value on the coexistence of healthspan and lifespan nowadays (yes, I’m reading Dr. Peter Attia’s recent book Outlive), and the moral of the story is that we are all subject to the inevitable; we simply owe it to ourselves to self-educate and minimize the risk of metabolic disease wherever we can. Excessive sugar just shouldn’t be high on anyone’s list for longevity and health. Complex carbs and protein are what I focus on now. Hammer, keep up the good work, and continue providing the products best suited for what we do.
———
Hammer Nutrition replied:
Hello Alexander, ditto and back at you. I genuinely appreciate your support and encouragement. Continuous Glucose Monitors are amazing technology that can be immensely helpful in discovering not only the effects of dietary sugar, but all of the other foods like grains and starches that also spike blood sugar and insulin. Keep hammering, we’ll be here. BDF
Love the article. So what should an avid 69 year old cyclist consume on training rides and races of 50-100 miles?
Can’t wait to receive your suggestions! Patton Coles. Long timer Hammer client.
———
Hammer Nutrition replied:
Hello Patton, thank you for your comment, question and support! Since I first introduced Sustained Energy in 1990, I’ve developed several products for what you suggest and all can be used in combination as desired for variety and sustainability. Those options include Hammer Gel, HEED, Perpetuem, Perpetuem Solids and Sustained Energy. For efforts over 3 hours, I recommend nut flavors of Hammer Gel, Perpetuem and or Sustained Energy due to their protein content. Add to this any form of Endurolytes that appeals to you – original capsules, extreme capsules and extreme powder that can be mixed into any drink. Add water and you’ll be set for centuries, double centuries or however long you want to ride. Before jumping in, please read my 5 Secrets of Success for endurance athletes (download it here for free: https://hammernutrition.com/collections/books/products/5-secrets-of-success). pre-exercise meal timing is crucial to maximize fat metabolism and spare glycogen. Next, determine your optimum calories per hour in training, that number is usually your bodyweight plus or minus 20%. Measured water intake is the next key. No matter how warm, hourly intake should not exceed 24-26 oz. Maintain electrolyte balance with Endurolytes AFTER you start pedaling, never before. I also have short videos and articles on fueling for under 3 hours and over three hours, as well as determining whether you are a water drinker or a drink drinker. The former tend to prefer their fuel in concentrated form to allow for water to be used for hydration. The later tend to prefer more dilute fuel mixtures that combine calories with fluids. Think Hammer Gel vs HEED. Lastly, we’re always available via phone, live chat and email if you have any questions or further personalization is needed. BDF
Thanks for a great article. I switched about 2 years ago to burning fat and have great results overall. I can go for a 3 hour ride without eating anything and be fine. I do find when doing very hard efforts (like hard XC skiing) a little bit of carb keeps me from bonking, but it only happens with really hard efforts and does not take much.
I found one other thing I would like to get your view on. Despite being in shape, not overweight, and fully “fuel flexible” burning fat, I found I still had insulin resistance and borderline type 2 diabetes. I finally figured out what it was: I had switched to a stevia based sports drink to avoid over consumption of carbs (which worked great metabolically). However, I found that my body’s perceived sugar punch from the stevia and a similar punch from toothpaste (yes toothpaste) was driving my insulin through the roof as if I was eating tons of sugar, with the attendant downstream consequences. When I cut both out my A1C went from 6.4 to 5.1 in 45 days with no other dietary or exercise changes. The biggest factor was actually the toothpaste, but both were significant (I cut them out one at a time and measured each).
Here is my question: For the reasons above, artificially sweetened sports drinks are not good, and high carb fueling drinks are also not good, but getting a regular drip of electrolytes is necessary. I went back to using endurolytes exclusively for electrolyte management, but I do find that mixing in a drink smooths out the delivery and has better results.
Someone (Hammer!) should make a low carb (focused on complex carbs vs sugar) high electrolyte drink. Can you do it? There is nothing like that on the market. Everything else out there is unhealthy. Heed is great, but the carb/electroylte ratio is too low for me.
Interested in your thoughts.
———
Hammer Nutrition replied:
Hi Eric,
Thank you for your contribution to the conversation. I’m not aware that a few milligrams of stevia can have the effect on blood sugar and a1c as you suggest, so I will definitely look into that. My personal experience and understanding is that insulin resistance is driven by two factors – total daily sugar intake and how many hours per day insulin dependent carbs are consumed. Lowering sugar is key, but If we keep the insulin busy 14-16 hours per day (carbs upon rising, consumed throughout the day and ending with our lest bedtime snack, insulin resistance and elevated blood sugar result. Continuing your current dietary practices, but restricting your eating window to 8 hours per day or less should be very helpful. However, you have me baffled on your last statements drink mixes. That’s what I’ve been doing for 35 years? All Hammer fuels are complex carb based – Hammer Gel, HEED, Perpetuem and Sustained Energy all fit into that category. If you want more electrolyte content in your bottle of HEED, Perpetuem and or Sustained Energy, just add a scoop or two of our water soluble form of Enduroltyes, called Endurolytes Extreme Powder. Also, Hammer Gel, HEED unflavored and Sustained Energy have no stevia or monk fruit content, so you have options there too. BDF
I’ve been riding for decades (raced up into my 40s and still ride hard every week at 69) and following Hammer’s nutrition studies going back to the early days. Hammer is still my goto provider for many products.
This article started out well, but I have to say ends poorly. Why? Because it really doesn’t tell me much accept things like this, “The willingness to follow deeply flawed and unhealthy guidelines has a lot to do with psychology.” and " I would urge you to buck this metabolically flawed trend. Do not be a One Trick Pony, completely dependent on sugar to generate ATP."
They sound more like a “TikTok” post than an instructional guidance article. Where’s the actual diet recommendations during competition, hard workouts and which Hammer products are a representation of this?
Maybe it’s a generational approach of communication, I just didn’t find this article helpful.
———
Hammer Nutrition replied:
Hello Drew,
Thank you for your comments and support. I’m sorry this article was not more to your liking and didn’t think the information about the unavoidable metabolic damage sugar does to our bodies helpful. But I am kinda confused – this article it’s about the new high sugar/carb fueling trend, why it’s so bad for your health and won’t work for 99% of the population. I’ve written about the opposite approach and what to consume during training and competition (less is best, optimize fat burning, consuming complex carbs in assimilable quantities during exercise with measured fluid intake and diet appropriate electrolyte replacement since at least 1992 when I printed the first issue of Endurance News. Our “Knowledge” section of the web site has every back issue of Endurance News and Endurance News Weekly for all to read and enjoy, without a subscription fee. BDF